California Steps Back From Dangerous Expansion of its Age-Gating Law

California Steps Back From Dangerous Expansion of its Age-Gating Law

The California legislature has stepped back from a plan that would have expanded its age-gating law,removing language that could have compounded serious threats to users’ speech, privacy and securityjust to browse the internet.A.B. 1856, authored by Assemblymember Buffy Wicks, will now move forward through the legislature without its most problematic pieces.

EFF still believes the underlying law that A.B. 1856 amends,A.B. 1043, is unconstitutional. Signed into law in 2025 (and effective January of 2027), A.B. 1043 requires all operating systems and app stores to collect users’ ages, place them in various age brackets and then block young people from lawful speech and services depending on their age. We also believe that even though A.B. 1043 does not require age verification, the liability it creates for operating systems and app stores—including fining operating systems up to $7,500 per affected child for violating the law—will push those services to verify users’ ages. In practice, that could lead to more ID checks, more biometric scanning, more invasive data collection and risk of breach, and more barriers to adults’ and young people’s lawful speech.

However, we appreciate that the Legislature has abandoned its plan to expand this problematic age-gating  framework to browsers and websites. This would have significantly expanded this dangerous law before it even took effect. We thank the author and committee staff for recognizing these harms and not moving forward with this language.

On top of that, EFF is pleased that an earlier amendment to A.B 1856reduced the threat to the open-source community by exempting open-source operating systems. Given these changes,EFF has removed its opposition to A.B. 1856. We appreciate the author for listening to concerns fromadvocates,developersandothersabout the effect it would have on open-source development and alsoaround expanding this problematic framework.

To be clear, we still believe the law passed last year threatens online anonymity, privacy, and security. A.B. 1043 is one of atroubling wave of proposalsthat encourage—or, in some cases, outright require—age verification. Our position on this is clear: no one should have to provide or verify their age to access the internet. Once users’ personal data is collected, it can easily be leaked, hacked, or misused. No matter the method, every age verification system demands that people hand over their sensitive and immutable personal information to link their offline identity to their online activity. That’s a bad deal for us all.

Age-gating mandates are reshaping the internet in ways that are invasive, dangerous, and deeply unnecessary. But users are not powerless! We can challenge these laws, protect our digital rights, and build a safer digital world for all internet users, no matter their ages. Thisresource hubcan help—so explore, share, and join us in the fight for a better internet.

Related Issues

Related Updates

California lawmakers have amendedA.B. 1709, but the core problem remains: the bill is still aban on social media access for youth under 16, and it still threatens theprivacyandFirst Amendmentrights of all Californians.Proponents of the bill may argue that the recent...

The Senate Commerce Committee is set to considerS. 737, the SCREEN Act, a sweeping age-verification bill that would require online services to verify users’ ages before they can access any sexually explicit content. If this bill passes, it will force millions of adult internet users to give up...

Several U.S. states are pushing to ban young people from social media entirely. This marks the latest wave of censorship bills masquerading as “children’s online safety” measures, with states likeMassachusetts,Idaho,Minnesota,North Carolina,South Carolina,Illinois, and EFF’s home state of...

After public outrage, California lawmakers are moving closer to exempting open-source operating systems from the sweeping age-bracketing regime mandated by last year’s Digital Age Assurance Act (AB 1043). Nonetheless, the current bill still jeopardizes internet users’ speech, privacy, and security.While the open source exemption, if passed, would improve the law,...

As statehouses ramp up for 2026, we’re seeing a familiar and concerning trend of lawmakers rushing to regulate the internet based on shockingly shaky science. From theCalifornia State Assemblyto theMassachusettsandMinnesotalegislatures, a wave of bills is crashing against the digital lives...

Update, May 11, 2026:Utah has agreed to not enforce the VPN law until Sept. 3, 2026 after Aylo, the parent company of Pornhub.com, challenged the law in court.For the last couple of years, we’ve watched the same predictable cycle play out across the globe: a state (or country) passes...

Related Issues

Back to top

Follow EFF:

Check out our 4-star rating onCharity Navigator.

Contact

About

Issues

Updates

Press

Donate